Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

“A Gallup Poll conducted last week [two weeks ago] showed Trump with negative ratings of 58 percent and positive ratings of 40 percent. These figures reflected similar findings in the Economist You Gov poll conducted at the same time, which had Trump down 54-44 percent. In contrast, YouGov had Pelosi down 52-48 percent and Schumer down 49-32 percent. Trump has higher disapproval, but Pelosi and Schumer have lower approval ratings — in part, I think because they are less well-known,” veteran polling analyst Jay O’Callaghan told Newsmax.

But so what? What’s the difference whose poll numbers are higher or lower?

Trending: Fox News Host Silenced?

Some might ask, “Doesn’t that equate to popularity which directly equates to reelection chances?”

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think Democrats will push out Representative Ilhan Omar over her anti-Semitism?

  • Do you think Democrats will push out Representative Ilhan Omar over her anti-Semitism?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to iPatriot updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The short answer is, as of right now, it makes no difference.

First, it’s a year and a half from the next election. In terms of public opinion, that’s an eternity. And second, it would have more significance if we were comparing apples to apples, but we’re not.

It all comes down to the design of elections and the job of each representative.

The founders envisioned three levels of representation and three levels of election or appointment.

The President represents all the States and people of America and this is the only national election. In other words, he is the Chief Executive who represents the Nation.

The House of Representatives, being closest to the people, represent the people of each State, and are elected accordingly within each State by several districts determined by population.

The Senate (originally) represented the States. Each was selected by appointed State electors, who then elect the two Senators who would be the voice of each State. This, of course, was changed by the progressive left of Woodrow Wilson’s administration to undermine States rights.

This was a brilliant system where everyone was represented. The Nation has a voice represented by the President, which is why he is in charge of foreign policy, dealing with other nations and the military.

The election of the House is a purely democratic system of whoever gets the most votes, represents that particular district. In this single case, this pure democracy works, because of the locality of the process. Voters already reside in the district, so no one group has an advantage.

And then there is the Senate, who was originally appointed by each State’s legislature, giving them proper representation in the National government. Without this provision of protection and self-preservation, many States would never have ratified the Constitution.

So what the hell does this long-winded historical soliloquy have to do with poll numbers?

Well, a lot. In this fight between Pelosi and the President, the only one who really has to worry about National poll numbers is the one who represents the nation and thus is elected on a national scale.

And of course, that’s Trump.

What does Pelosi care about her national poll numbers? She may be Speaker of the House, but at the end of the day, she’s just one of 435 Congresspeople. And as I explained, Congress is elected directly by the people of their relatively small State districts. The only ones Pelosi has to worry about pleasing in order to stay in Washington as long as she has (since 1987), are her constituents in California’s 12th Congressional District.

And as we know, representing San Francisco, she has nothing to worry about, unless she moderates, which won’t happen.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author and are not not necessarily either shared or endorsed by iPatriot.com.

The Common Constitutionalist

Brent Smith, aka The Common Constitutionalist, is a constitutional conservative who advocates for first principles – the founders' original intent and enemy of progressives. He is former Navy and a martial arts expert. Smith considers himself just an average Joe with no formal journalism background – but rather than simply complain about the state of our nation, he took to the Internet to battle the left.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

CONTACT US

Need help, have a question, or a comment? Send us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.

Sending

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account

Send this to a friend