Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

I don’t think you’ll often hear Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) defending the President’s actions, but CNN has become so aggressively “anti-Trump” that even she has been forced to defend the President. It happened during a conversation with CNN’s ultra-liberal morning host, Chris Cuomo, who wanted Collins to attack the President for meeting one-on-one with former FBI Director Comey. However, Collins wasn’t biting, and she reminded Cuomo that Trump has never been guided on protocol for these meetings and that it was Comey’s job to explain that protocol to the President. (A task Comey never even tried to fulfill.) Instead, Collins argued, Comey actually set the precedent by clearing the room and asking for one-on-one time with the President during their very first meeting.

That decision by Comey likely indicated to Trump that this was how such business was supposed to be handled. It’s a reasonable argument from Collins, particularly since Comey never tried to explain differently to the President.

Chris Cuomo: But how could he not know when he asked the A.G. and his son- in-law and others to leave. And when they tried to re-enter, told them to leave so he could talk to Comey? I mean doesn’t that tell you everything you needed to know about whether or not the president was being – acting in ignorance or acting with complete intentionality?

take our poll - story continues below

What is your top alternative to Facebook? - FIXED

  • What is your top alternative to Facebook?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to iPatriot updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Canadian Protesters Beg Trump for Help!

Susan Collins: Not necessarily, and here’s why. The first interaction that the president had with Mr. Comey in early January at Trump Tower, it was the FBI director who cleared the room so that he could have a one- on-one discussion with the president about that salacious dossier. And I wonder if perhaps that made the president think that whenever there’s some sensitive conversation to be had with the FBI director, that it should be one-on-one, because he had two subsequent one-on-one meetings, as well as other phone calls, with the FBI director. That doesn’t make it right, but ironically perhaps the FBI’s actions in that first meeting sent a signal to the president that that is how their interactions should take place.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqL4eaVYz0I

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author and are not not necessarily either shared or endorsed by iPatriot.com.

Lars Lamonte

Libertarian, pissed off at big government and today's party politics in general.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

CONTACT US

Need help, have a question, or a comment? Send us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.

Sending

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account

Send this to a friend