Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

In breaking news which confirms the conspiracy theories of many on the far right, internet detectives, and anyone who can connect more than one dot, on Dutch TV on Tuesday, Julian Assange outed murdered DNC staff Seth Rich as his source for the Hillary Clinton email scandal.

In mid-July, Seth Rich was killed on a back street of Washington D.C. His wallet was untouched. His valuables were left in place. No leads have been found to-date. Given the timing of the Wiki-leaks revelations, amateur sleuths argued Seth Rich was on his way to meet with the FBI to provide further detail and thereby threaten the Hillary Clinton campaign. Despite the logical chain, prior to Assange’s interview, no concrete link between Rich and the Wiki-leaks documents existed. Now it does.

Julian Assange spoke to Rich’s involvement in the following segment:

Trending: Pence just Won the Presidency for Trump

“Julian Assange: Whistle-blowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often very significant risks. As a 27 year-old, works for the DNC, was shot in the back, murdered just a few weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Congress Remove Biden from Office?

  • Should Congress Remove Biden from Office?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Reporter: That was just a robbery, I believe. Wasn’t it?

Julian Assange: No. There’s no finding. So… I’m suggesting that our sources take risks.”

The video itself is available below:

The simple and now sourced trail from the murder of a DNC staffer to Hillary Clinton is now very simple. According to Assange, Seth Rich was the source of the Hillary Clinton Wiki-Leaks scandal. Seth Rich was murdered. Period. Both are clear, indisputable, non-speculative facts. It doesn’t take a court of law to prove “beyond a reasonable doubt” the nature of the murder or the motive for the murder. The facts truly do speak for themselves.


The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author and are not not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

Jay Guy

Jay is a regular American citizen who is tired of the American people losing to the mainstream media and Progressives.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.


Need help, have a question, or a comment? Send us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.


Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?

Send this to a friend