Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

There is a narrative that is being promoted today by the left and the media that is a stalking horse argument surrounding transgender bathroom and locker room “choice.” They argue that this has not been a problem in the past and that transgender individuals “only want to pee.”

Their argument ignores the two most important arguments against transgender “choice” of a bathroom or locker room that fits their gender identity.

First, is the issue of privacy. I have empathy for transgender people. I cannot imagine how difficult their lives are. However, to invade the privacy of a majority to accommodate the interests of less than one half of one percent of the population makes no sense. This is of minor to moderate concern when it comes to public bathrooms or “Restrooms.” The fact is that most men simply would not care and virtually all women’s restrooms provide the privacy of stalls. As adults, most of us would learn to live with these new rules, albeit with some discomfort for many.

Unfortunately, this is not the case for school locker rooms. As almost every American recalls, the school locker room experience in junior high school and high school, even in college, especially for pubescent and adolescent children, was awkward and embarrassing at best, panic inducing to some, and impossible to others. These children’s bodies are under transition. They are not yet comfortable with their own gender and sexuality and most would prefer not to have to undress or shower in a public setting, even with their closest friends of like gender. Now force upon them the requirement to change, undress, or shower with and in full view of someone of the opposite anatomical gender, regardless of that individual’s self-assigned transgender identity? This places a near impossible and unfair burden on the majority of children.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Congress Remove Biden from Office?

  • Should Congress Remove Biden from Office?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Obama’s Lies, Scandals, and Corruption (a Partial List)

To be fair and equitable, we must provide the best possible accommodation to transgender people as possible, that does not infringe on the privacy rights of the majority. In most cases this means assignment to a separate facility such as a faculty dressing room or single use dressing room and bathroom.

Second, we all know that some criminals and deviants will falsely claim status as transgendered as a ruse that gains them access to the bathroom or locker room of the opposite gender. Why are we so certain of this? Because it is already happening! Are there not enough peeping Toms, sexual predators, and rapists already without creating a vehicle that makes their predatory behavior easier?

I am not anti-transgender. I support equal rights for all. However, I do not support reverse discrimination against majorities for the sake of accommodating a small minority in a way that infringes on the rights of that majority. To paraphrase Mr. Spock in one of the Star Trek movies, “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.”


The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author and are not not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

John Stevens

John is a third generation native from Washington DC, born in 1951, now living in Central Florida. He is a graduate of the US Naval Academy Class of 1974, a former commissioned officer in the US Navy, and since leaving the Navy has worked primarily as a civilian contractor to the US Government. John currently own and runs a small consulting company, Synergistic Services Inc., that helps commercial companies pursue and win competitive contracts from Federal, State, and International governments, by training, mentoring, and leading contractor teams to win new business. John and his wife have been married for more than 43 years and have two wonderful sons of whom they are incredibly proud along with five fantastic grandchildren who are future leaders of our nation. Politically, John is an unabashed libertarian-conservative and Constitutionalist who believes as did Supreme Court Justice Alito in originalism and textualism when it comes to interpreting the law. John firmly believes in limited Government and that our Federal Government should be strictly limited to only those powers enumerated in the Constitution -- and no others. John believes equally strongly that the rights of the people are given by God, protected by the Bill of Rights, and never should be restricted or abridged without due process


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.


Need help, have a question, or a comment? Send us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.


Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?

Send this to a friend