Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

“Human Rights” and “Social Justice” are a violation of both rights and justice. And both are simple concepts which are not negotiable.


Each person, individually, has a right to life, liberty and property, unless they try to take that right from another, in which case he loses all rights. No criminal has a right to anything. Every “human right” given to a criminal is an unjust privilege which mocks justice and violates the rights of the victim of the crime. Rights cannot be collectivized. They are individual and only applicable to a natural person, for a collective has no life, liberty or property apart from its individual members.

Trending: De-Plorabus Unum


take our poll - story continues below

Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?

  • Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Justice occurs when each person gets rewarded for his merits and punished for his offenses as soon as possible. If a person gets punished for his virtues or rewarded for his crimes it is injustice. If one person can be punished for a crime and another cannot, it is injustice. If one person gets a speedy trial and another does not, it is injustice. “Social justice” attempts to give corruption, sloth, and criminality “equality” when they have, by definition, lost these rights, by commission or omission.


“Tolerance” is an attempt to confuse mercy with impunity. Mercy can only occur after conviction of a crime. Impunity prevents judgment and thus prevents both justice and mercy, which leads to resentment instead of healing.


Criminal behavior requires that action results in a loss of rights. Absent the loss of rights. The alleged “feelings” or “suffering” of anyone is no proof whatever of injustice or a violation of rights by another.


“Political correctness” is a fraud with the sinister purpose of thought control by authority. It is tyranny in its worst form.


The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author and are not not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

Herman Gazort

What I write stands -- must stand -- on it's own. Do not fall into the fallacy of argumentum ad verecundiam -- "believing in" power, prestige, and money -- "credentials." To truly believe what you see and hear, think, verify and prove it, for yourself, by yourself.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.


Need help, have a question, or a comment? Send us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.


Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?

Send this to a friend