Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

In a previous article, I thought it might be of interest to discuss the subject involving the “Letters to the editor” that appear daily in various print and online news sources. Comments ranging from the absurd, comical, and what is pure hyperbole, to the harshest, vulgar spewing, and most hate-filled sentiments out of the minds of what are usually normal people, I think, are available for your perusal.

In a recent letter to the editor, one, in particular, caught my attention and its content stood out beyond all the others. The individual, who shall remain anonymous, but for purposes here let’s call him Mr. Smith, inquired with the editor why this particular tabloid thought it appropriate to print “comments that were so insulting and condescending that they will further divide the people”. The writer further decried what he had read over time, and felt that to continue to allow such comments will promote a climate of hostility and might instigate cause for someone who may already be on the borderline of stability, to strike out violently.

We could all agree that the writer’s intent was noble, and sought only to make an effort to remind the editors that they had an obligation to edit out what would be considered in polite society any comments that were deemed out of the realm of what is acceptable. It is apparent to any of us who do in fact make it a point to read the letters to the editor that many of the respondents are incapable of explaining themselves in clear, civil, concise and simple terms, and perhaps out of frustration resort to inflammatory rhetoric. But then there are also the ideologues and bigoted, and yes hate mongers whose minds reside in the gutter or some dark place.

After some consideration, I thought it appropriate to respond to John; hopefully, the tabloid would see fit to print my letter. Sure enough several days later it appeared, and here is what I wrote:

[In the April 20 edition Mr. Smith writes that he is troubled by the fact that the editor prints hateful rhetoric and insulting comments from its readers, and that this further divides people. Although john’s misgivings, which I am certain are shared by many readers, and his intentions noble, he is naïve to think that the editors are interested only in printing objective truths and facts, and when applicable constructive and fair criticisms.

Mr. Smith this newspaper has a liberal agenda, and that is mainly to belittle, insult and undermine President Trump, Republicans, and conservatives, and to diminish their moral authority and influence, and one of the ways they accomplish this is to feed into the hate and insolence of the ignorant and the ideologues, most of whom are on the cultural left].

Most of us have an agenda, whether in our personal or business lives; we set out each day with specific things to do. It can involve scheduling ourselves to arrive at work on time, or buying something at the supermarket, a doctor’s appointment, or meeting a friend for lunch; we plan and take measures to accomplish a set of goals. Now perhaps there are those who just wake up in the morning and wander through life by the seat- of- their- pants, or dresses, whatever will be will be, and without so much as a casual glance at establishing guidelines and principles, and laying down a set of priorities; not having any idea what lies around the next turn, or caring. The achievers, however, will have an agenda.

When we think of agendas, it will usually involve politics or the media, and like most of the media, the object of discussion here, whether in print, online, radio or cable news there is an agenda, as I explained in the response letter sent to the editor. Aside from selling their product and attracting advertisers, and making a profit, the media will make every effort to increase their newspapers circulation, television viewership or radio listeners. They should do this in accordance with conventional practices and norms, and within established parameters of their business, usually.

But in postmodern America, agendas have been reformatted, so to speak, and have taken a stark turn, especially in the media. I would venture to say, in most cases, they have devolved to a state that is devoid of what were once standards of decency and integrity. Journalism and the fourth estate, in all their manifestations, have been transformed into rigid and uncompromising ideological bastions of partisan demagoguery, and their agendas reflect this.

So to all of you out there who are concerned and troubled, you’re not alone. But keep this in mind, if you see something, or read or hear something that you believe is inappropriate, improper, or just plain untrue, then say something. Fear, not any reprisal or criticism, you can handle it. Take a stand; let your voice be heard, just as did Mr. Smith.


iPatriot Contributers


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.


Need help, have a question, or a comment? Send us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.


Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?