Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

When did we enter ‘Bizarro World’?

Based on the things I am seeing on my TV, I can only conclude that I’ve somehow left my home dimension and somehow entered into an alternate reality.

Earlier this week, Fox News contributor (and former host) Judge Andrew Napolitano argued that President Trump most certainly did obstruct justice during the Russia investigation. To call such an assertion “wrong,” would be an understatement. But that’s not the surprising thing here, people have wrong opinions all of the time. What’s shocking here is that the opinion comes from a man who has generally been a staunch defender of President Trump over the last couple of years. (And on a network where the President is generally defended.)

Trending: America 2016: Concentration Camps, Lists of Citizens, and Guillotines

Here’ what Judge Nap said:

take our poll - story continues below

Which Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has The Wildest Campaign Promise So Far?

  • Which Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has The Wildest Campaign Promise So Far?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to iPatriot updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

When the president asked Corey Lewandowski, his former campaign manager, to get Mueller fired, that is obstruction of justice. When the president asked his then-White House counsel to get Mueller fired and then lie about it, that’s obstruction of justice. When the president asked Don McGahn to go back to the special counsel and change his testimony that’s obstruction of justice… But ordering obstruction to save himself from the consequences of his own behavior is unlawful, defenseless and condemnable.

What’s even more shocking is … who comes to the President’s defense against Judge Nap. The person who rises to the challenge is none other than the liberal law professor, Alan Dershowitz.

Here’s Dershowitz’s response:

Alan Dershowitz: I do not agree. I think Judge Napolitano is terrific and we often agree about the law, but in my introduction to the Mueller report, I go through the elements of obstruction of justice. The act itself has to be illegal. It can’t be an act that is authorized under Article Two of the Constitution…

It’s not even a close case.

The best analogy is President George H.W. Bush pardoned Casper Weinberger on the eve of his trial in order to stop the Iran-Contra investigation. The special prosecutor said he did it for that reason. Nobody suggested obstruction. It can’t be obstruction of justice if the president is acting within his authority.

Nixon obstructed justice because he acted outside his authority — destroying evidence, paying hush money, ordering his subordinates to lie to the FBI.

Fox News Host: Napolitano said he told people to write letters to the file, he told people to go and deliver messages.

Alan Dershowitz: Not obstruction of justice, those are all legal acts. If he ever told somebody to lie in front of a grand jury, that would be obstruction of justice.

The President appreciated Dershowitz’s eloquent defense:

These are strange times we are living in.

Strange times.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author and are not not necessarily either shared or endorsed by iPatriot.com.

Lars Lamonte

Libertarian, pissed off at big government and today's party politics in general.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

CONTACT US

Need help, have a question, or a comment? Send us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.

Sending

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account

Send this to a friend