Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

This article came about because a reply to a comment was censored and the publication was delayed and I was required to resubmit the reply over, and over, during 4 days. When replies in a debate are censored, even if just for a matter of days, Fist amendment (1A) rights are violated. Articles and commentaries have a very short lifespan, so justice delayed is justice denied.

So that all readers can see the points on both sides of a debate and decide on the arguments, truths, and concepts for themselves, legitimate responses must be published immediately. To censor one side of the debate even if just for a day, weakens the others’ side and puts bias to the debate — a clear violation of 1A.

It is clear that some believe that the EO on immigration was executive overreach. If it was, similar judicial rulings would have also been similarly ruled. However, they were not. So, it was, in fact a politically motivated judicial overreach which did not protect the rights and freedoms of all. It, in fact attempted to increase political privilege while diminishing the rights of all citizens.

Just law formalizes justice to protect the rights of all citizens. Corrupt law embodies privilege for a few at the cost of justice for all citizens. The 45th President of the United States seems to understand this principle. The 9th Circuit Court may yet learn that in a just society, “separate, but equal, powers” does not permit the judicial system to become a tool for special privilege for political purposes.

Trending: No More Black Vs. White!

A President who has the mandate of preserving the rights of all citizens has the power to cut through deception and political intrigue to require and create just law. And, because he has the power of the popular mandate, he can do so, simply by cutting the knots of unjust law designed and interpreted to promote the privilege of a few over the rights of all citizens. When legal precedent is causing the damage, legal precedent need not be used to correct it. To get to the core of the problem, one can speak simply and clearly, without citing previous court cases. The argument stands on its own merits.

take our poll - story continues below

Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?

  • Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

People can be enslaved by the tyranny of those who make or interpret unjust law. The Executive, Legislative and Judicial powers are separate, but equal. The check and balance is that the Executive can appeal to reason and justice if unjust law is made or just law is interpreted unjustly. The check is against overreach, and it applies to all branches, not just the executive.

Alexander the Great cut the Gordian Knot.


The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author and are not not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

Herman Gazort

Prove everything. Don't rely on me or any "expert." Find truth for yourself. I will give you what I found and try to convince you with proof, information, example and a solid argument, but trust no one. Prove your truth for yourself, by yourself. That is how you can defend it.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.


Need help, have a question, or a comment? Send us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.


Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?

Send this to a friend