Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Vaccines: Good or Bad? Part 1

When I was growing up I actually believed that the FDA was doing what it was designed to do, make sure the foods we eat are properly labeled, there was no bad things allowed in the food.  I’m sure that when they first began that they did just that.  But as I grew up people began telling me about the chemicals that they allowed to be put on our food and in our food and for many years I refused to believe that our government would allow that to happen.  Then my eyes were opened.

When you see people in the fields with literal hazmat suits on spraying our foods, that bubble burst.  The more I researched the more I saw that the FDA, EPA, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, Department of Education and the list goes on and on, did very little for the American people.  Case in point, the Department of Energy was formed in 1977 under Jimmy Carter for the purpose of making America energy independent, a very good idea.  At that time we were importing about 20% of the oil we consume.  Today, forty years later, that department has a budget of around $26 billion and we import about 70% of the oil we consume.  We have the oil we need.

Our reserves exceed Saudi Arabia’s and Russia’s:

The US holds more oil reserves than Saudi Arabia and Russia, the first time it has surpassed those held by the world’s biggest exporting nations, according to a new study.

Rystad Energy estimates recoverable oil in the US from existing fields, discoveries and yet undiscovered areas amounts to 264bn barrels. The figure surpasses Saudi Arabia’s 212bn and Russia’s 256bn in reserves.

The analysis of 60,000 fields worldwide, conducted over a three-year period by the Oslo-based group, shows total global oil reserves at 2.1tn barrels. This is 70 times the current production rate of about 30bn barrels of crude oil a year, Rystad Energy said on Monday.1

One has to ask if we have more oil than them why are we not accessing it.  It was George H. W. Bush that locked up ANWAR.  The other question that should be asked is, what are they spending $26 billion on?

We see these types of things in virtually every government agency.  The EPA is supposed to help our environment clean and free of harmful chemicals but they are allowing what is known as Agent Orange to be sprayed on our crops and Genetically Modified Organisms to contain Agent Orange.

The Environmental Protection Agency has refused a petition that aimed to ban the sale of a powerful pesticide linked with cancer — and while already available, a surge in sales is expected as scientists ready a new crop resistant to the chemical.

Not only has the EPA rejected a petition that sought to prohibit the domestic sale of the dangerous 2,4-D pesticide — a key ingredient in Agent Orange — but the main manufacturer of the chemical predicts that sales will skyrocket in the coming months. The reason, it would seem, is that Dow Chemicals is awaiting federal approval of a genetically engineered crop they’ve created that will be resistant to 2,4-D.

If approved, farmers will be able to plant the frankencrop corn variant and douse their fields with the pesticide to eliminate unwanted weeds with greater success. Although 2,4-D isn’t currently used to a large degree on corn fields, all that could soon change for the country’s most successful crop. Opponents argue, though, that the potential side effects of the pesticide are enough to push for a ban on 2,4-D altogether.

The Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental watch group, has argued that expose to 2,4-D has caused in some cases cancer, hormone disruption, genetic mutations and neurotoxicity, reports the New York Times. In voting not to hear the petition against the pesticide, however, the EPA says that they believe there to be a lack of evidence that would be significant enough to raise suspicion.2

That was the chemical that ruined the health of so many of our troops in Viet Nam not to mention the people of Viet Nam.  My brother died from being exposed to it when he was a ‘dirt sailor’ in Viet Nam in the late 60’s.  I’ve talked to many Viet Nam vets today that have had their health seriously compromised by exposure to Agent Orange.  It is the main ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup.  Virtually all GMO products are engineered to withstand exposure to Roundup.

It is a health hazard that hasn’t come fully to the attention of the public yet simply because Main Stream Media refuses to report on it. The GMO mass experiment on the public is producing results—terrifying ones. GM toxic elements can be found in nearly all pregnant women and children. (Update of the article featured in Genetic Roulette movie.)

The toxins designed into genetically modified crops are finding their way into the bloodstreams of all pregnant women and their fetuses. This shocking result belies the genetic modification industry’s claims that such toxins are destroyed by the digestive tracts of people who eat the animals fed these GMO crops. Obviously, that claim was based on nothing.

(If you’ve seen reports claiming less than 100% are affected, it’s because they picked up the wrong figures from the study, as shown below.)

The Study and Results:

The study, “Maternal and fetal exposure to pesticides associated to genetically modified foods in Eastern Townships of Quebec”, was published in the journal Reproductive Toxicology. The authors, Aziz Aris and Samuel Leblanc, examined the blood of 30 pregnant women and 39 nonpregnant women. All births associated with the study were considered normal; babies were at normal birth weights and considered healthy.

The authors looked for:

  • Glyphosate, brand name Roundup
  • Gluphosinate, a broad-spectrum herbicide
  • AMPA, aminomethyl phosphoric acid, a metabolite of glyphosate
  • 3-MMPA, 3-methylphosphinico propionic acid, a metabolite of gluphosinate
  • Cry1Ab, the Bt toxin of gluphosinate

Interestingly, both glyphosate and gluphosinate were found in large percentages of nonpregnant women, but neither was found in pregnant women or their fetuses. Obviously, a metabolic change occurs when a woman becomes pregnant. One might have hoped that would be adequate to prevent the toxic effects of GMO feed crops. Unfortunately, it appears that the opposite occurs with Bt corn metabolites, though no toxins from gluphosate were found. 3 

This initial report is an example of the ‘fake news’ concerning the dangers of glyphosate.  When you read the entire article you will see the true results, the results that the EPA simply ignores.

The reason I mention all of this is to show a pattern in our present government.  That pattern is money will by anything and there really is a plan behind their insanity.  This series of articles will only scratch the surface of what we are facing but I want you to be aware of what is going on behind the scenes.  John Kennedy stated on October 28, 1963 “There’s a plot in this country to enslave every man, woman and child.  Before I leave this high and noble office, I intend to expose this plot.”  Seven days later he was assassinated.

We can’t just lay down and let government do what it wants.  We are here because we stopped paying attention.  It will be difficult to stop but we have to stand.  Our kid’s future is at stake.  We have to try.

Next week, the lies about vaccines.

Foot Notes

  1. http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/05/us-oil-reserves-surpass-those-of-saudi-arabia-and-russia.html
  2. https://www.rt.com/usa/epa-pesticide-24-d-petition-831/
  3. http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/gmo-toxins-are-nearly-all-pregnant-women-fetuses

iPatriot Contributers

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

CONTACT US

Need help, have a question, or a comment? Send us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.

Sending

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?