Unite for Freedom
Would You join A Class Action Lawsuit to Force Obama to Prove Eligibilty?
While most believe this issue is DOA, I for one have long suspected that Obama would eventually release a forged document. Until the original has undergone forensic testing, I will not believe it is real. In fact experts all over the country are coming out of the woodwork and crying FAKE!!!
Anyone with a little GIMP or Photoshop knowledge can clearly see that this is a created document, and not a very good one at that.
Let's give Obama the benefit of the doubt for a moment, it still doesn't change who he is or what he believes. He is still a Marxist and should clearly be classified an Enemy of the State and tried for Treason.
As I expected, the liberal media is howling in laughter, seething with derision, and counting it as a victory and final death blow for conservatism.
I say not so fast!
We can't let up, in fact we need to drill in even deeper. We may or may not be able to force the testing of the actual document (if there is one) but we can certainly continue to demand his other records, we can continue to organize and develop strategies to defeat this liar and remove him and his putrid entourage from office.
Don't give up. Press in!
Tom
I believe that this is the greatest threat to our constitutional republic that has ever been foisted upon us and that we MUST demand to see ALL of Obama's records. What is he hiding?
Most people seem to dismiss or ignore the Obama eligibility question without knowing the true facts. Regardless of the many other arguments such as his hiding his birth records and scholastic records, both parents are required to be natural born U.S. citizens. His weren't. This alone disqualifies him. Period!
If Obama were proven to be ineligible to hold the office of President, everything he has signed into law would automatically be repealed, and he along with Biden would be removed from office because the ticket would have been illegitimate from the outset.
The court cases brought against him have been on behalf of a few individuals, that the courts have said "Have no Standing" to bring the case. They have been dismissed not on evidence, but on the question of standing. If we as taxpaying Americans who will have to live under the regulations this man signs into law and their resulting consequences, how is it that we don't have standing to demand our President prove his eligibility? (The treatment of Col. Terry Lakin was shameful) Not to mention our first amendment right to a redress of grievances against the government.
It is my thought that a judge would have a very hard time dismissing thousands, tens of thousands, or even millions of Americans joined together requiring the right to discovery. A grass roots effort could accomplish this very quickly across the Internet.
So the question is... would you be willing to join with other patriotic Americans in a Class Action Law Suit demanding the removal of Barak Obama based on the fact that he is ineligible to hold the office of President?
________________________________________________________________________
UPDATE:
Please Continue to Add Your Reply to this Post!
Please Send this URL to everyone who might be interested in joining also.
The response to this post demonstrates that people are excited about the possibility of taking personal and direct action to address the issue of Obama's refusal to produce a Birth Certificate, College Records, and a myriad of other documents that would fill in the blanks of this man from no-where.
I am in the process of contacting several people who can help me determine:
1) Is a Class Action Suit legally viable
2) Can I count on certain people with resources and influence to participate in this effort and take it viral across the Internet.
3) How quickly can we mount a lawsuit. I am also trying to find out if the majority of attorney's who have been or are fighting the battle already are willing to share information in order to determine what has worked, what has failed, and how can we move forward without going over the same ground that has already been covered by the multiple suits.
I am asking people who want me to keep them informed to send me their e-mail address to:
classactionpower@gmail.com
If I try to send e-mail from gmail they will probably close the account so I will work on setting up an email address that I can send from.
Some are worried about the cost, it is my hope that if we can get certain people to cooperate and we know that there will be a massive response, each person on the suit can join for free if they just can't afford to help, but that the majority would donate $29.95 each to cover the cost of mounting the suit. That shouldn't break anybody. Once an attorney(s) are in place we can address how the donations will be processed and accounted for.
If enough people respond we can use it to finance a media blitz that would gain greater support and publicity putting more pressure on those deciding the case.
Of course I may find out that no one wants to touch this effort, at which point I will share that with you also.
God Bless you, and God Bless America!
Tom Cooper
Tags: Obama, action, class, eligibility, law, remove, suit
Views: 172
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by James P. Rosin on -
Every red blooded American should be proud to display their legal birth certificate, but especially the person who is supposed to lead the country. I personnally believe that when anyone deliberately withholds this information they are inviting criticism and convincing me that there is something terribly wrong with this picture. Additionally, there are volumes of evidence that this man has much more hidden to the detriment of the American people and that leads one to believe that if we were to verify what we already highly suspect, we would be scared to death and racing to the nearest Tea Party Organization to push for Impeachment of Obama and all of the co-conspiritors in his Chicago "gang" of molestors.
-
Permalink Reply by Ronald on
-
Simple---You can not have what you do not have-----He is buying time and at the same time doing his thing--destroying the American way of life.....We have a house and senate that should be leading and demanding show your credentials or be charged with treason
William S MacLaren said:Yes we all need to demand that this fool prove he is how and what he says he is
the US milatary police should go to the White house and place this tratior under arest and place him in jail till he realess his documents. If he has nothing to hide then why is he hiding his records.
he his entire famialy and all his cazars need to go and we need a real American that cares about America to be our President.
-
Permalink Reply by Clois Beckwith on
-
Some are worried about the cost, it is my hope that if we can get certain people to cooperate and we know that there will be a massive response, each person on the suit can join for free if they just can't afford to help, but that the majority would donate $29.95 each to cover the cost of mounting the suit. That shouldn't break anybody. Once an attorney(s) are in place we can address how the donations will be processed and accounted for.
If you just ask for $1.00 per person, you will have plenty of money to do the job, then it will not break the people joining the suit.
If you get "Greedy", it an't going anywhere...... People can afford a dollar. as long as a dollar is still worth a dollar?
-
Permalink Reply by Chu Lai 1966 on
-
You cannot charge a non-citizen with treason.
Ronald said:
Simple---You can not have what you do not have-----He is buying time and at the same time doing his thing--destroying the American way of life.....We have a house and senate that should be leading and demanding show your credentials or be charged with treason
William S MacLaren said:Yes we all need to demand that this fool prove he is how and what he says he is
the US milatary police should go to the White house and place this tratior under arest and place him in jail till he realess his documents. If he has nothing to hide then why is he hiding his records.
he his entire famialy and all his cazars need to go and we need a real American that cares about America to be our President.
-
Permalink Reply by Pamela Jane Lofland on
-
All this may be a moot point. If enough states pass legislation that you have to submit a long form birth cetificate to be on their state ballot ..that could answer all the questions....and that is already happening in a number of states. Obama had better be getting the best forgers he can find between now and 2012..else he may be out of a job...and that would be a dream come true for sure.
-
Permalink Reply by Roy Duncan on -
You're right and we'll be paying 100% as soon as he can manage it. obama sr. also said that in his book. The obama family are devout communist.
CREW said:I read yesterday that at some time BHO did an interview and said it was ok to tax people 100% as long as you give them help. I guess he meant welfare.
-
Permalink Reply by william olsen on
-
Your right...obama is not even a citizen of the USA....How in the hell have we got ourselves into such a predicament??
Chu Lai 1966 said:
You cannot charge a non-citizen with treason.
Ronald said:
Simple---You can not have what you do not have-----He is buying time and at the same time doing his thing--destroying the American way of life.....We have a house and senate that should be leading and demanding show your credentials or be charged with treason
William S MacLaren said:Yes we all need to demand that this fool prove he is how and what he says he is
the US milatary police should go to the White house and place this tratior under arest and place him in jail till he realess his documents. If he has nothing to hide then why is he hiding his records.
he his entire famialy and all his cazars need to go and we need a real American that cares about America to be our President.
-
Permalink Reply by Clois Beckwith on
-
find between now and 2012...else he may be out of a job.
We can't wait until 2012, this country and the dollar will be BUSTED, by then. We need this Usuper out of office now. If the congress doesn't have the B-lls to do it, then we need to include all of the names from the 111th congress in addition, to the suit as Co-Conspiritors for all of the states NOT checking and certifying from all 50 states, instead of just Hawaii's certification to congress. Congress didn't do what they were suppose to do, having all 50 states "Certifying" to the Speaker of the House, that BHO had in deed MET the constitutional requirements for the presidency.... from what I have seen and read BHO did NOT meet the constitutional requirement and the congress only used Hawaii's certification, they should have had 50 certifying letters (One from each state, with official State Logo's) instead of one letter.
-
Permalink Reply by Bobbie Meaders on
-
Angel Jenkins said:Who is a natural-born citizen? Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday?
The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State
wherein they reside." But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the
Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills
in the gaps. The Constitution authorizes the Congress to do create clarifying
legislation in Section 5 of the 14th Amendment; the Constitution, in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4, also allows
the Congress to create law regarding naturalization, which includes
citizenship.Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States
at birth:"- Anyone born inside the United States *
- Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
- Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
- Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
- Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
- Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
- Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this
time) - A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
* There is an exception in the law — the person must be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.
Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.
-
Permalink Reply by Barbara Hendley on
-
Yes I would sign it
-
Permalink Reply by william olsen on
-
Your an idiot....If u dont know the difference between a natural born citizen and a native born citizen, u have no right to post comments here...Really, how dumb can u be over this point after 2 years of the usurper in office fraudulently??
Bobbie Meaders said:
Angel Jenkins said:Who is a natural-born citizen? Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday?
The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State
wherein they reside." But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the
Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills
in the gaps. The Constitution authorizes the Congress to do create clarifying
legislation in Section 5 of the 14th Amendment; the Constitution, in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4, also allows
the Congress to create law regarding naturalization, which includes
citizenship.Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States
at birth:"- Anyone born inside the United States *
- Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
- Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
- Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
- Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
- Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
- Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this
time) - A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
* There is an exception in the law — the person must be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.
Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.
-
Permalink Reply by Suzanne C. Short on
-
I believe it does not matter where Obama was born, for he by his own admission was or is a citizen of Indonesia. One cannot have duo citizenship to hold the office of the Presidency. Also, He man not have even renewed his citizenship here in the U.S. even if he was citizen, not Natural Born, for he could not have been a Natural Born Citizen with his Father as a British subject. Then, there is the question of his Birth in Kenya. I also posted on this site the link to today's news on Newsmax that the Governor of Hawaii has admitted he cannot find Obama long form Birth Certificate. Then there is the question to why does Obama use multiple Social Security numbers from people who have passed away. Most likely, he was never issued a Social Security number. His mother also used various Social Security Numbers. There are many questions that he will not answer, so the only way is to present a lawsuit in hopes that an honest and patriotic judge will be administered. "In God We Trust."
Tom Cooper said:
I am including a link to an interesting article that has been scrubbed from the Internet. It has likely just been missed and will be scrubbed if it gets any attention. There were more updated and authoritative versions available at one time but this is the only one left. It gives a fairly reasoned
explanation historically as to why Obama does NOT fit the intent of our
forefathers as a natural born citizen. Hurry before it magically disappears....http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20090223214349/http://www.greschak...
I apologize about the problems with formatting and some typos in my response to Angela, i tried to correct them but the server would not accept them.
© 2013 Created by iPatriot.
