Unite for Freedom
Would You join A Class Action Lawsuit to Force Obama to Prove Eligibilty?
While most believe this issue is DOA, I for one have long suspected that Obama would eventually release a forged document. Until the original has undergone forensic testing, I will not believe it is real. In fact experts all over the country are coming out of the woodwork and crying FAKE!!!
Anyone with a little GIMP or Photoshop knowledge can clearly see that this is a created document, and not a very good one at that.
Let's give Obama the benefit of the doubt for a moment, it still doesn't change who he is or what he believes. He is still a Marxist and should clearly be classified an Enemy of the State and tried for Treason.
As I expected, the liberal media is howling in laughter, seething with derision, and counting it as a victory and final death blow for conservatism.
I say not so fast!
We can't let up, in fact we need to drill in even deeper. We may or may not be able to force the testing of the actual document (if there is one) but we can certainly continue to demand his other records, we can continue to organize and develop strategies to defeat this liar and remove him and his putrid entourage from office.
Don't give up. Press in!
Tom
I believe that this is the greatest threat to our constitutional republic that has ever been foisted upon us and that we MUST demand to see ALL of Obama's records. What is he hiding?
Most people seem to dismiss or ignore the Obama eligibility question without knowing the true facts. Regardless of the many other arguments such as his hiding his birth records and scholastic records, both parents are required to be natural born U.S. citizens. His weren't. This alone disqualifies him. Period!
If Obama were proven to be ineligible to hold the office of President, everything he has signed into law would automatically be repealed, and he along with Biden would be removed from office because the ticket would have been illegitimate from the outset.
The court cases brought against him have been on behalf of a few individuals, that the courts have said "Have no Standing" to bring the case. They have been dismissed not on evidence, but on the question of standing. If we as taxpaying Americans who will have to live under the regulations this man signs into law and their resulting consequences, how is it that we don't have standing to demand our President prove his eligibility? (The treatment of Col. Terry Lakin was shameful) Not to mention our first amendment right to a redress of grievances against the government.
It is my thought that a judge would have a very hard time dismissing thousands, tens of thousands, or even millions of Americans joined together requiring the right to discovery. A grass roots effort could accomplish this very quickly across the Internet.
So the question is... would you be willing to join with other patriotic Americans in a Class Action Law Suit demanding the removal of Barak Obama based on the fact that he is ineligible to hold the office of President?
________________________________________________________________________
UPDATE:
Please Continue to Add Your Reply to this Post!
Please Send this URL to everyone who might be interested in joining also.
The response to this post demonstrates that people are excited about the possibility of taking personal and direct action to address the issue of Obama's refusal to produce a Birth Certificate, College Records, and a myriad of other documents that would fill in the blanks of this man from no-where.
I am in the process of contacting several people who can help me determine:
1) Is a Class Action Suit legally viable
2) Can I count on certain people with resources and influence to participate in this effort and take it viral across the Internet.
3) How quickly can we mount a lawsuit. I am also trying to find out if the majority of attorney's who have been or are fighting the battle already are willing to share information in order to determine what has worked, what has failed, and how can we move forward without going over the same ground that has already been covered by the multiple suits.
I am asking people who want me to keep them informed to send me their e-mail address to:
classactionpower@gmail.com
If I try to send e-mail from gmail they will probably close the account so I will work on setting up an email address that I can send from.
Some are worried about the cost, it is my hope that if we can get certain people to cooperate and we know that there will be a massive response, each person on the suit can join for free if they just can't afford to help, but that the majority would donate $29.95 each to cover the cost of mounting the suit. That shouldn't break anybody. Once an attorney(s) are in place we can address how the donations will be processed and accounted for.
If enough people respond we can use it to finance a media blitz that would gain greater support and publicity putting more pressure on those deciding the case.
Of course I may find out that no one wants to touch this effort, at which point I will share that with you also.
God Bless you, and God Bless America!
Tom Cooper
Tags: Obama, action, class, eligibility, law, remove, suit
Views: 172
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Brandon Vallorani on -
Why can't Wikkileaks leak his birth certificate? They certainly seem to have access to every other classified doc...
-
Permalink Reply by Thomas Loftis on -
Yes I would, I do not believe he is a citizen of the U.S. and something should have been done about it already.
-
Permalink Reply by Angel Jenkins on -
Who is a natural-born citizen? Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday?
The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State
wherein they reside." But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the
Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills
in the gaps. The Constitution authorizes the Congress to do create clarifying
legislation in Section 5 of the 14th Amendment; the Constitution, in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4, also allows
the Congress to create law regarding naturalization, which includes
citizenship.Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States
at birth:"- Anyone born inside the United States *
- Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
- Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
- Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
- Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
- Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
- Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for
at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this
time) - A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
* There is an exception in the law — the person must be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.
Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.
-
Permalink Reply by Clois Beckwith on
-
So which one does BO fall into, now that you have placed this here? Is it this one? "Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)" or another. I can't see any other applicable except as quoted in this paragraph.
-
Permalink Reply by william olsen on
-
You are stating absolute trash...You must be an obama operative...Natural born citizen does not have a thing to do with anything u stated...You are putting out false propaganda designed to mislead and deter people from the truth who read and post on these blogs..PLEASE LEAVE WHOEVER U ARE!!!!
-
Permalink Reply by Angel Jenkins on
-
both parents are not required
-
Permalink Reply by william olsen on
-
Hate to blow ur bubble but in order to be a natural born citizen qualified under our Constitution to be POTUS, both of your parents must be US citizens...The law and history is clear as a bell on this fact...It simply cannot be ignored , unless of course u choose to remain in absolute darkness!!!!
-
Permalink Reply by Tita Gascoin on -
Both parents are definitely required, if not, the person is a dual-citizen, with divided loyalties.
-
Permalink Reply by Kim Humburg on
-
Happy to join this movement......amazing how this has gone on so long...and ignored. Some dang powerful blinders for an entire country to blow something this huge off! Yes, the way to get all the crapola they passed thrown out! With all the capitulating the repubs just did with the terrorist in the WH's judicial choices, we are just gunna be screwed for a long, long time.....we need to expose all of this. His Occidental records prove he was registered as a foreign student.....why, oh why, is this not being pursued? I think Sarah will follow it like a blood hound and they know it...one more reason they attack her so much. If McCain had let her follow this path in 2008, we may not be having this discussion...although, with the voter fraud so rampant, who knows who is winning elections for real. Gosh I sound so cynical. Sorry. Merry Christmas and Happy Birthday Jesus!!
-
Permalink Reply by Tom Cooper on -
Angela has added a bit of skullduggery to this forum by cutting and pasting a recent revision to article 8 of the U.S. Code which was adopted as an update to this section of the United States Code:
Title 8 > Chapter 12 > Subchapter III > Part I > Section 1401
§ 1401. Nationals and citizens of United States at birth
Title 8 of the US Code as currently published by the US Government reflects the laws passed by Congress as of Feb.1, 2010, and it is this version that is published here.
I appreciate Angela brining to light however that our current outlaw congress has recently changed these requirements, no doubt to cover their tracks and to combat upcoming lawsuits regarding Obama’s
ineligibility.Please note, THIS IS NOT THE LAW AS IT EXISTED WHEN OBAMA WAS BORN… OR WHEN HE WAS ELECTED!!!
I want to say to that in forming this response it is absolutely unbelievable how many articles have been scrubbed from the Internet, even from the Way Back Machine which archives every web page ever created on
the Internet. I knew this was happening but when you want to do research you
really begin to see the broad brush of cover up. And I am a conspiracy nut?I only lightly brushed upon the many arguments to Obama’s eligibility, and I know that there is not enough room here for a dissertation. But as a small example, Obama’s father was a British National and therefore
creating at best for Obama a condition of Dual Citizenship. While not expressly
addressed in the constitution itself, a
multitude of constitutional authorities even dating from the framing of the constitution
make a clear distinction about the intent of the law to exclude any dual
citizenship from the definition of “Natural Born Citizen.” It was fairly assumed that the definition in
and of itself was self explanatory and therefore was not given more attention
to detail. It was to protect the U.S. from a President who might have foreign
loyalties, and who could be held to a
foreign set of laws when outside the U.S.Obama was also under his second father raised in Indonesia as an Indonesian citizen (a fact that allowed him to travel to Pakistan at the age of 20 on an Indonesian passport. At the time American citizens were
not allowed to travel to Pakistan)Indonesia does not recognize dual citizenship, and therefore Obama’s British AND if he ever had it, U.S. citizenship would have been had to be forfeited in order for him to become an Indonesian citizen and
attend the schools there, which every account says he did.Remember, no case has been dismissed on evidence, only on a bias amongst the judiciary to refuse anyone the right to standing to bring the charges. Itself an act of treason in my opinion.
Even Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has said the high court is "evading" the issue. Hints of division within the Supreme Court on the issue existed as far back as
December 2008, as Justice David H. Souter had initially denied the case a hearing,
but Justice Thomas agreed to bring it back for review. The case did not,
however, obtain the required approval of four justices to move it forward to a
full hearing.So far, the Supreme Court has not yet heard any case challenging Obama's eligibility on any grounds.
I would like to link to an article I have that has been scrubbed from the Internet, but I would need to put it online and right now I don’t have a place to do that. It would probably
just be scrubbed again, but it is a succinct history of how the founding
fathers and subsequent courts and legal minds have interpreted the meaning of
Natural Born Citizen, and Barak Obama doesn’t fit!
Angel Jenkins said:
Who is a natural-born citizen? Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday?
The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State
wherein they reside." But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the
Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills
in the gaps. The Constitution authorizes the Congress to do create clarifying
legislation in Section 5 of the 14th Amendment; the Constitution, in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4, also allows
the Congress to create law regarding naturalization, which includes
citizenship.Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States
at birth:"- Anyone born inside the United States *
- Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
- Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
- Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
- Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
- Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
- Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this
time) - A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
* There is an exception in the law — the person must be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.
Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.
-
Permalink Reply by Tom Cooper on
-
I am including a link to an interesting article that has been scrubbed from the Internet. It has likely just been missed and will be scrubbed if it gets any attention. There were more updated and authoritative versions available at one time but this is the only one left. It gives a fairly reasoned
explanation historically as to why Obama does NOT fit the intent of our
forefathers as a natural born citizen. Hurry before it magically disappears....http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20090223214349/http://www.greschak...
I apologize about the problems with formatting and some typos in my response to Angela, i tried to correct them but the server would not accept them.
-
Permalink Reply by Shane Rone on -
It would be a waste of time. Obama would win somehow and we would look like a bunch of supersititious idiots. Plus, why would Biden be removed from office?
© 2013 Created by iPatriot.
