“Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events;
Small minds discuss people.”
Henry Buckle, 1901
Hitler was a very good student. Those who read Mein Kampf will find therein many good words about America. More precisely, not about the whole of America, but about the numerous attempts of the American socialists to change the foundations of the American way of life.
The idea of forced sterilization and forced abortion was adopted by Hitler from the founder of feminism, American socialist Margaret Sanger. Madame Sanger even founded a special clinic for a mass black abortion to reduce their number, and then to completely eradicate blacks in America. This organization still exists – this is Planned Parenthood.
The idea of a “final solution” of the “Jewish question” was simply borrowed by the German National Socialists from the idea of American progressive socialists about the “final solution” of the “black question”.
Hitler also adopted the idea from American intellectuals of mass cleansing the society of “undesirable elements” with the use of gas chambers. In the early twentieth century in America, there was a science (more precisely, pseudo-science) of eugenics. This pseudo-science was very popular in progressive socialist circles (now it seems moronic, but in our time, there is such pseudo-science popular among leftists – “global warming”, for example).
Hitler was a subscriber of the main scientific journal of American racist eugenics for many years. There he discovered the proposal of the American progressive socialist Paul Popenoe on the mass euthanasia of “undesirable elements” using gas chambers. Popenoe’s book “Applied Eugenics” is still sold in the US.
I know that many of my readers have relatives killed in gas chambers. My family is no exception – all except for my grandfather’s family died in the Holocaust (that’s why, by the way, our last name is so rare).
The American socialists who proposed this idea of using gas chambers are guilty, as well as the German socialists who implemented it.
The infamous racial laws of Germany in 1935, which made Jews completely disenfranchised, were copied by National Socialists from the American segregation laws of Jim Crow. German lawyers in most cases simply substituted the blacks with Jews in the text of the laws. The laws of Jim Crow were adopted by democratic authorities in most southern states in America.
Many of the laws of Jim Crow existed until 1965. By the way, the Democratic Senator Albert Gore (the father of former US Vice-President Albert Gore), voted against the law on civil rights in 1964.
Why are these racial laws called Jim Crow? Jim Crow was a popular caricature representing the black population in the 19th century. What did the Russians call the Germans during the WWII? They were called Fritzes. “Fritzes” are Germans, whereas Jim Crow represents blacks.
The racist laws of Jim Crow are the laws about blacks. The racist Nuremberg laws of 1935 are the laws of the Jews. For the sake of justice, it should be noted that in the matter of the “purity of race” the National Socialists were more humane than the American socialists, and the Nuremberg laws were less racist than the laws of Jim Crow. But both of those laws were adopted by politicians who were on the left flank of the political spectrum.
The favorite of “progressive humanity”, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, nominated Hugo Black, a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, to the post of Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. Black was one of the longest-serving Justices of the Supreme Court and is notorious for having legally justified Roosevelt’s decision to forcibly transfer all Americans of Japanese descent to concentration camps during the Second World War.
Approximately 10 years ago, at the International Numismatic Convention in New York, I stumbled upon a 1939 coin of the Third Reich of 5 marks. The coin was unusual – there was a long inscription on the edge. I carefully recorded it: “Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz”.
The translation of this inscription is well-known to anyone who ever lived under the totalitarian socialist regime – “Society’s needs come before the individual’s needs”. There was nothing sensational in this inscription – ordinary fascism. Another demonstration of Hitler’s concept of a “socialist people’s state”.
Only a few days later I came across this phrase a second time. This time, from the lips of Hillary Clinton (not word for word, but in meaning). The phrase “society’s needs” was present.
The father of Benito Mussolini was a member of the First Communist International, as were Marx and Engels. At the end of his life, he completely lost his mind from Marxist ideas, up to the point of taking part of the payment for his services (he was a blacksmith), forcing his clients to listen for hours of his lectures on Marxism. Little Benito passed the full course of historical and dialectical materialism as early as school age. Thus, right after school, at the age of 18, he joined the Socialist Party.
Barack Obama joined the Socialist Party (Democratic Socialists of America – DSA) not immediately after school, but somewhat later, just after Harvard.
Of course, many of my readers are very unhappy with the selection of facts in this article. But I must remind everyone of George Orwell’s famous quote, which said: “Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”
If you do not want to hear that your relatives died because of a misanthropic socialist ideology, this could be a big problem for you in the future.
If you are a member of the Democratic Party and do not want to hear about your ideological brethren – Nazis, fascists, socialists, communists, this can be a big problem for you in the future.
If you do not want to hear that the organized criminal group “Antifa”, created by the activists of the Democratic Party, is a fascist organization, this can be a big problem for you in the future.
If you do not want to hear that the organization of white racists Ku Klux Klan was created by the activists of the Democratic Party, this could be a big problem for you in the future.
If you do not want to hear that the organization of black racists Black Lives Matter has been created by the activists of the Democratic Party, this may be a big problem for you in the future.
If you do not want to hear that the candidates for the presidency of the United States from the Democratic Party were essentially a Menshevik (Hillary Clinton) and a Bolshevik (Bernie Sanders), this could be a big problem for you in the future.
If you do not want to hear that the US Democratic Party has turned into the main anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli party in America over the past decade, this may be a big problem for you in the future.
If you do not want to hear about all of this and prefer to simply brush aside what is happening in America now, this can be a big problem for you in the future.
However, you should not forget the words of the wise Greek politician and military leader Pericles, who said back in the 5th century BC: “Just because you are not interested in politics, doesn’t mean that politics won’t take an interest in you.”
What we see now, after the final seizure of the US Democratic Party by neo-Marxists, after the 8 years of the first anti-American American President Obama, must be taken seriously, very seriously.
A solemn tone is called for, not only by American conservatives but also by American leftists. Professor Noam Chomsky, who has unquestioned authority in the leftist circles, recently wrote that “Antifa is a great gift for the right.”
Mr. Chomsky saw a lot in his lifetime, and he quite correctly estimated the threat from the fascist monster created by the American left. This monster can at any time get out of control and bury the remnants of any hope to make the Democratic Party respectable. In fact, which respectable party will rely on the gang in black a la SS robes who operate strictly Gestapo methods?
Especially for the American ex-Soviet emigre audience, I want to submit that in this connection I am very disappointed.
It seemed to me that all the former homo soveticus amazingly had the ability to read between the lines.
It seemed to me that all the former homo soveticus came to the New World with a steady vaccination against socialism and its variety – fascism.
It seemed to me that the former homo soveticus instantly recognize fascism in any form, despite the slogans that neo-fascists hide behind.
It seemed to me that the former homo soveticus would immediately determine that two competing factions of the American fascists had collided in Charlottesville.
It seemed to me that all the former homo soveticus, having access to all the world’s media in America, will inevitably come to the conclusion that modern Russia is an aggressor state.
I was wrong.
It was Reagan, who prophetically predicted: “If fascism ever comes to America, it will be called liberalism.”
Political terminology, of course, can change with time.
But good and evil are never relative. Good and evil are always absolute.